Shortbread, Dammit

by Shaun Hunter


recipe.jpeg

I have a love/hate relationship with my grandmother’s shortbread. It’s delicious to eat, and maddening to make.

My grandmother was a shortbread snob. No quick-and-dirty recipe for her. She disdained those light, insubstantial cookies made with icing sugar and whipped together in an electric mixer. Her shortbread was dense and serious, the ingredients worked together by hand. Real Scottish shortbread, she would say with her chin lifted and her gaze unwavering, daring you to disagree. She often made pronouncements like this, backing them up with evidence she had polished into glinting certainties. Calling her out on her prejudices and closely held truths was a kind of sport in our family. But when it came to shortbread, what was the point of arguing? Though my grandmother wasn’t a Scot, I never doubted her recipe was the genuine article. She wouldn’t have settled for anything less. And, of course, the proof of the cookies was in the eating.

Long after my grandmother died, I attempted her recipe. Not just to carry the tradition forward, but to satisfy a deep craving for one of the delights of my childhood. The cookies were rich with memories. The icy early morning drive downtown with my father on deserted fluorescent-white streets to meet the night bus from the Okanagan. My grandfather smiling and rosy, my grandmother disgruntled and fussing. The slow reveal of the shortbread stowed in my grandmother’s suitcase: undoing the crisscross of elastics strapped around an old Pot of Gold chocolate box, pulling away the layers of paper towel swaddling. The first bite of the pale, precious cookies she had carried across the Rocky Mountains because I had asked.

The first few batches failed. I wasn’t surprised. Very little about my grandmother was easy.

A few years ago, I decided to give shortbread another try. I was writing about my grandmother then and the way her legacy of high expectations and rigid confidence was tightening around me. As I tried to turn my memories into stories, the material resisted me. After countless drafts, a narrative was beginning to emerge. Something was happening to me, too. As I loosened myself from my grandmother, I was finding a new way to love her.

This time, I measured the ingredients carefully, following her handwritten recipe to the letter. The butter was soft; the brown sugar, generous. I added the flour, cornstarch and, as instructed, just a little salt. Poised over the mixing bowl with my sleeves pushed up, I checked the recipe. Mix and knead with your hands thoroughly. My old frustration prickled. How long was “thoroughly”? I expected more than this vague adverb from a woman who had been so exacting.

I kept going. “Thoroughly” meant working harder and longer than I thought was necessary. “Thoroughly” was not giving up until I satiated my hunger. My fingers ached, but the dough was still loose and dry. I beckoned my better, more mindful self. I kneaded. I breathed. I let go. As I surrendered myself to my grandmother’s shortbread, the dough turned into a smooth, warm, pliable ball.

My baker self was jubilant, and so was the writer. As the aroma of shortbread filled the house, I grabbed a scrap of paper. My hands sticky with dough, I scribbled down the details of this new, unexpected chapter.

Last Christmas, I was lighthearted as I set out to make shortbread. Not only had I found the knack of my grandmother’s recipe, I was in the final stages of a manuscript centred on our relationship. I had completed a book with a beginning, middle and end – obstacles encountered and overcome. The shortbread played a starring role as a metaphor for the way my grandmother’s bitter legacy had turned into something more sweet.

But this time, as I worked the dough, the ingredients refused to come together. I persevered, dumping the dry mass on the counter. The old story. I cursed as the dough fell apart under my rolling pin. Why couldn’t the shortbread play along with my narrative? I salvaged a few of the cracked, misshapen cookies and threw the rest in the trash.

Christmas is coming. Instead of baking, I have been writing about shortbread. I thought I could whip together a seasonal essay – something light and insubstantial – but the story isn’t cooperating. I work and rework it, pull it apart, put it together, pull it apart again. Every time I think it’s finished, the essay splits open.

Take charge of your nonfiction story, an expert says. Find the controlling idea. There is no shortcut to good storytelling, just years of practice, failure and study of the discipline.

A memory pushes through the cracks. My grandmother curled over one of her crochet projects, ripping apart the stitches and starting all over, scowling because her vision of the thing she set out to make eludes her. It's just a blanket, I’d say as she held her project too tightly, trapping herself in the imperfect results of her labour.

Christmas is here and I am hungry for my grandmother’s damned shortbread. I’ve found a new recipe, posted online by Shirley Gardiner from Clearwater, Manitoba. She uses the same ingredients as my grandmother, but her instructions are more precise. I admit: I like Shirley's tone, too. She promises these cookies are a snap to make.

As I write, a pound of butter softens on the kitchen counter.

 


The Million-dollar Question

by Shaun Hunter


Wikimedia Commons 

Wikimedia Commons 

“How do you know you have a personal story that’s interesting to other people?”

This question popped up at a LitFest panel I attended in Edmonton last month, and then in a conversation at a family dinner. The panelists’ answers and my own were vague and unsatisfying.

When I’m writing a personal story, I try not to think too much about who will be interested in reading it until after I have put the experience on the page. Still, the question lurks. How do you know?

Lately, I’ve been unable to resist reading the remarks of contest judges. If I wrote my personal story according to who likes what and why, could I be more sure of making it interesting?

My unscientific sampling of jurors turned up as many personal preferences. One judge admired “discipline and restraint” and the “notable (and refreshing) absence of simile and metaphor.” One was partial to “trustworthiness,” another “ambivalence.” Another favoured innovation over “straight-line narrative,” and still another preferred “writers who aren't trying to be too cute with structure.”

Perhaps these are all facets of the winning qualities of a personal nonfiction narrative but mostly they remind me that a reader’s response to a story has a lot to do with taste. In that case, the answer to the million-dollar question is to stay in the game, put rejection in perspective, and keep sending work out.

On the excellent Essay Daily blog, the editor Stephanie G’Schwind offers another possibility.

“It’s one thing to have an interesting story, or perhaps we should say experience. But that’s not the same thing as having an interesting essay.” Sometimes, amazing experiences “don’t translate into very interesting essays.”

G’Schwind considers a few of the personal essays she has published in Colorado Review, and how the writers transform the particular into the universal. (Her thoughts on parallel narrative – the story on the ground, and the story in the sky – are a must-read.)

Over at Write Nonfiction Now, Dinty Moore suggests intention is critical. He quotes Richard Hoffman: “If you want to be a writer, at some point your allegiance must shift from experience – what is important to you, what happened to you, what you saw – to artifact – what you make of it.”

Moore says writers of memoir aren’t recording machines: “We are artists.”

And, making art is something a person can learn how to do.

I can’t help but think of Alistair MacLeod and his advice: “Write about what worries you.” If you craft a personal story about that idea or memory or experience that wormed its way into your head, it will almost certainly resonate with someone else, too.


So You're Writing a Memoir

by Shaun Hunter


 

Wikimedia Commons  

Wikimedia Commons  

My colleague, Barb Howard tells me the memoir manuscripts are pouring into her Writer-in-Residence office at the Calgary Public Library. She recently asked me if I had any suggestions she could pass along to would-be memoirists.

Here are my top three:

(1) Read Vivian Gornick’s The Situation and The Story

This is a classic text, referred to often and always by people who write personal nonfiction. It’s not the book to read when you’re starting to write, but it’s an excellent gate to pass through once you’ve hammered out a first draft.

Gornick’s book is dense and a little obscure in places. It took me a while to understand what she was talking about, and then more thinking to apply it to my own memoir-in-progress. Time well spent when I was ready to sort out the difference between the circumstances of my narrative (the situation) and the insights (the story) I was trying to express.

(2) Check out Bill Roorbach’s Writing Life Stories

I stumbled upon this book almost a decade ago when I realized I was not a fiction writer. I turned the pages and felt like I had walked into a friendly and encouraging writing workshop. I still refer to Roorbach’s chapter on scenemaking (“scene is nearly always what’s missing when a piece of creative nonfiction fails to come to life”). His exercise on teasing out the big ideas in a personal story gave me the tools to do the work Gornick insists upon.

(3) Read as much excellent memoir as you can.

Sue William Silverman’s reading list, which includes memoirs of all stripes, is a good place to start. Check out the personal narratives shortlisted for the Canadian nonfiction prizes. Memoirs of this caliber offer all sorts of answers to the problems that can come up in your own story.

Writing a memoir means spending much of your time diving deep into your own life. It’s important to come up for air every so often. Consider these reading suggestions as an opportunity to remind yourself what the world has to offer. And a chance to breathe.